Xfce vs lxde reddit. Didn't include Deepin, Pantheon, Budgie or Enlightenment due to lack of experience with them. If you prefer an alternative desktop environment such as Xfce, Cinnamon or MATE you can download a Fedora Spin for your preferred desktop environment and use that to install Fedora, pre-configured for the desktop environment of your choice. TDE is definitely the lightest resource wise followed by LXDE,LXQT and XFCE. Desktop environment for all Features Lightweight LXDE runs anywhere, from a Raspberry Pi to a junkyard computer. LXDE and XFCE are two of the top Linux desktop environments out there, between them offering sleek UIs, customizability and the kind of desktop elegance that every Linux user wants. As compared to Xfce, MATE is a bit glossier. 感想 概ね想像通りの結果となった。 Xfceについては思ったよりメモリ使用量が多い印象を受けるが、EndeavourOSデフォルトのXfce環境が（透過が有効だったりと）割とグラフィカルだったので、本来はもう少し軽量かもしれない。 It has a wide range of built-in applications, which are designed to integrate seamlessly with the desktop environment. So try opening and closing programs and check resources after that. Though I personally prefer Xfce, I have had a good experience with LXDE, as well. Which light-resource desktop environment is better: Xfce, Lxqt, or Lxde? And what's the most light-on-resource Linux that can be paired with it? Debian? There is no better, just different. It doesn’t support as many features as Cinnamon but it’s lighter on resource usage. If you like Xfce or MATE, they are excellent DE's, but they are available with many distros. If you run a pig like firefox you will have a baaaaad time. I would classify LXDE and LXQt as light to middle weight and possibly slightly lighter than XFCE with a W95 vibe. Yes that XFCE has just more options to choose like menu more panel plugins etc. Thanks for the laugh of the day :D. LXQt/LXDE vs. [LXDE vs XFCE vs KDE vs GNOME], [Linux vs BSD], [vi vs emacs], not to mention the distro wars Why do we need so many alternatives? I understand that there are advantages to having alternatives, that not everyone has the same needs and that today's star product can become tomorrow's failure. Kde is getting better these days. If you have equipment with 4GB RAM, LXQT, LXDE or IceWM will be much lighter Compare Xfce vs LXDE and 20 other options side by side to learn "What are the best UNIX-like desktop environments for developers?" Which one to choose? some of my friends also told me that Xfce is most polished and has more features than other two. What would you pick? Eight desktop environments and one Window manager The online installation allows you to choose Xfce, Plasma, Gnome, Mate, Cinnamon, Budgie, lxQT, lxDE, and i3-wm, but there’s more… Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. LXDE is the last resort on ultra-low-end old computers. They’re also both based on Ubuntu, so there is little difference in the underlying system itself. XFCE actually is not much lighter (if any) than KDE but much less configurable/clunky (frankly, I'm not sure why anyone uses XFCE anymore except due to dated rep for being a lightweight king). on the other handside the Lxqt is also good but it has less features although it is little bit lighter and snappier my friends keeps on telling. I had AntergOS w/ KDE on my mom's X230 and it ran really well. LXDE vs. Xfce on Debian possesses vast software choices and an efficient experience, making the pair very formidable. LXQt (Previously Known as LXDE) LXDE was considered as one of the lightest desktops environment. Linux Mint is an elegant, easy to use, up to date and comfortable desktop operating system. All are about the same. You can run XFCE on Raspberry Pi OS (Raspbian), you might be thinking about the PIXEL desktop which is a modified version of LXDE and is the default desktop on Pi OS. You’ll be confused and wish to return to whatever we had previously if we walk through several Linux forums looking for the finest desktop. Xfce (Lubuntu vs. LXQt was previously known as LXDE; therefore, this may also be regarded as an LXDE vs Xfce comparison. From Xfce's perfect balance to LXDE's extreme efficiency and MATE's polished traditional interface, we cover everything you need to know to make the right choice for your machine. LXDE (or Lubuntu) on the other hand is a newer DE, not that polished as Xfce, it takes several apps from Ubuntu and Xubuntu instead of having it's own equivalent (for example notifications, power manager, disk manager, and window manager (Openbox)). Also (at least on the Arch repo with everything included) the Xfce package is 41mibs vs Lxqt's 23 mibs. Unless you really do need to count every megabyte, just use XFCE. That being said, Xfce is far more stable and mature; Lxqt is young and seeing a lot of work, which is great, but certainly makes it a moving target and opens the door for more issues. Comparison of the best lightweight Linux desktop environments. You can use what ever you want on X230, it's one of a beast machine. Xfce LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only one part of the story. before we toss it, I thought I would try a last effort of saving it using Linux. Considering how much progress GNOME and KDE have made, using XFCE does not make much sense if we want "lightness" I really like XFCE (especially Thunar) and I've been using it for a long time, but I definitely wouldn't say it's light It's great, but definitely not light. XFCE has been around since forever and is still very light weight. com Sort by: Best I think for Xfce, I used “xfce4”, kde was “kde-plasma-desktop”, gnome was “gnome-core”, lxde was just “lxde”, open box was “openbox”, enlightenment was “enlightenment”. They have their own window managers and file managers, and many components can be installed separately from each other. Learn which is better between LXDE vs XFCE today. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Unity vs. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. LXDE is usually agreed to be the lighter of the two, but there can be differences depending on the distro and XFCE has some niceties like the unified settings manager that could make it a better choice. The real problem will be the applications you run. LXDE looks more basic compared to Xfce. MATE: Old Gnome, keeping Gnome alive as a more traditional desktop One article says LXQT and LXDE is faster than XFCE while another one says this isn't true as it depends on what programs you use. Community Many companies making single-board computers use LXDE as their desktop ItsRetix43 LXDE vs XFCE: Which Is the Better Lightweight Desktop Environment? maketecheasier. As someone already pointed out: XFCE > LXDE. Confused with the available choices of Cinnamon, MATE and Xfce variants in Linux Mint? Let me help you with which Linux Mint version should you use. If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. Xfce and LXQt are, in effect, collections of standalone programs packaged together. Xfce even after closing apps, it sticks to resources. However, GNOME 3 has added and modified many things since GNOME 2, and now the gap between GNOME 2 and Xfce looks very small. It varies though a bit depending on the distro as some dont use SystemD and run a bit lighter. Xubuntu) for an old Asus EEE PC Dear all, My wife's old Asus EEE PC (700 series) is really slow now (it's still running XP) and because she has come to love this thing so much. Side-by-side analysis of features, pricing, pros and cons to help you choose the best option for your needs. We compare the five leading Linux desktop environments, including KDE, Gnome and Cinnamon, in a 7-round face-off to help you find the one that’s right for you. You might like distros that use one of the other DEs as it's default better than or as much as Mint. Manjaro tends to favor this because it's a rolling release, so it keeps the UI and Desktop stable while updating everything else. I still use devices with 1GB of RAM, and LXDE is good, LXQt is good too, Xfce depends a little with the version (newer versions using GTK3 of course are heavier; why I don't use MATE anymore with old devices as it ported to GTK3 much earlier). KDE is lighter weight and more configurable and more Windows-like than Gnome. So, for the convenience of our readers, we’re comparing two popular desktop environments, LXQt Vs Xfce. XFCE and LXDE/LXQt amazing environments and in the video, I will cover many of the differences Why do people install openbox on xfce (rather than just using lxde)? I've heard that xfce is a lightweight desktop environment, but for underlying window manager, many users replace the default xfwm with openbox. Discover the key differences between XFCE and LXQt, two of the most popular lightweight Linux desktop environments, to find the best fit Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. true Most resource intensive: Gnome (although improving a lot currently) Heavy resource usage, but not as bad as Gnome (more or less in order from heaviest to lightest): Cinnamon, Plasma, XfCE, Mate Very lightweight: LXQT Extremely light: Trinity Didn't include LXDE due to being essentially unmaintained. Xfce vs. LXQt vs Xfce: Which is better? 1: Customizability Intel Graphics On Ubuntu: GNOME vs. When GNOME 2 came out, Xfce was regarded as the most lightweight option. Each one has it's own fans that will praise one and reject others. XFCE: built to be modular, configurable and stable. Compare Xfce vs LXDE and 11 other options side by side to learn "What are the best *nix desktop environments not using systemd?" 17 votes, 39 comments. Xfce has gained a reputation for its ability to consume fewer system resources, making it a great option for computers with older hardware or limited resources. Unfortunately, when I tried LXQT, I was plagued with stability, workflow, and memory issues. LXQt vs Xfce: Which is better? 1: Customizability Loading Loading Click to continue Actually I used Lxqt because I found it to be faster than Xfce, I based this of online data comparing the two and Xfce vs Lxqt's predicessor: Lxde ( which is probably lighter than Lxqt). . In an effort to standardize, we will be using LXLE to represent LXDE and Xubuntuto represent XFCE. LXDE phoronix. XFCE is a little more flexible and feature rich and can be, if desired, be made to resemble W7, which some people still love. Hey, so I have this old laptop it has a bad CPU and everything what should I use Xfce or KDE since people say KDE uses as ram… I never really saw the point of LXDE. KDE and XFCE are two impressive desktop environments known for their resource efficiency and performance. For the the true Mint experience, I like Cinnamon. Versions takes years to come out and this creates a very long term stable setup for users. LXDE and XFCE are two of the most popular lightweight desktop environments for Linux. Modular LXDE is completely modular, take parts out or add them back, or even use a component without LXDE! Familiar LXDE comes with a classic user experience so you can get started right away. Been using xfce on latest Refracta 64bit system and I reckon xfce uses less ram am I right or do you think otherwise ?? Loading Loading Click to continue It has a wide range of built-in applications, which are designed to integrate seamlessly with the desktop environment. com Compare Xfce vs LXDE. Whether you are a newbie or a veteran, this is the best way to use vanilla Xfce desktop on a distribution. If you have equipment with 4GB RAM, LXQT, LXDE or IceWM will be much lighter Download New Features Release Notes Light, simple, efficient Xfce Edition Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment. They take away a lot of the inconsistent things about their respective DEs, and it makes it easier to focus on the parts that matter. But to take an example Xfce uses it's own window manager, xfwm, while LXDE/LXQt does not have a window manager on their own, instead they use the OpenBox window manager, but in both you could use another window manager. KDE vs. The 2GB RAM will suck if using a browser much. 4ds2w, qfoui, 2ah7, pqz5v, 9bml, xjaz7, z9ckn, mlff, c5m9k, fuaec,